Effect of altered spacing between uhpT promoter elements on transcription activation.

TitleEffect of altered spacing between uhpT promoter elements on transcription activation.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2000
JournalJournal of bacteriology
Volume182
Issue16
Pagination4430-6
Date Published2000 Aug
ISSN0021-9193
AbstractMany bacterial promoters possess multiple sites for binding of transcriptional activator proteins. The uhpT promoter, which controls expression of the sugar phosphate transport system in Escherichia coli, possesses multiple sites for its specific activator protein, UhpA, and a single site for binding of the global regulator, the catabolite gene activator protein (CAP). The binding of UhpA to the uhpT promoter was determined by DNase protection assays; UhpA displayed different affinities for the target sites. The upstream or strong sites, between positions -80 and -50, exhibited a higher affinity for UhpA than did the downstream or weak sites, between positions -50 and -32, adjoining the RNA polymerase-binding site. Phosphorylation of UhpA strongly increased its affinity for both sites. To examine the possible roles of the two sets of UhpA-binding sites, a series of insertion and deletion mutations were introduced at the boundary between them, as suggested from the positions that were protected by UhpA against hydroxyl radical cleavage. Deletions extended in the direction of the weak sites. The insertion or deletion of one helical turn of DNA resulted in the loss of promoter activity and of occupancy by UhpA of the remaining weak-site sequences but was accompanied by normal occupancy of the strong site and no change in the gel retardation behavior of the promoter fragments. However, the deletion of two helical turns of DNA, i.e., 20, 21, or 22 bp, resulted in the novel appearance of UhpA-independent expression and in an additional level of expression that was dependent on UhpA but independent of an inducing signal. The UhpA-independent promoter activity was shown to result from activation by CAP at its more proximal position. UhpA-dependent activity under noninducing conditions appears to result from the binding of unphosphorylated UhpA to the strong sites, which are now in the position normally occupied by the weak sites. Thus, regulated phosphorylation of the response regulator UhpA enhances its occupancy of the weak sites where favorable contacts can allow the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter.
URLhttp://jb.asm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10913075
PubMed Linkhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10913075?dopt=Abstract
Short TitleJ Bacteriol